bill
Feb 05, 2006, 02:00 AM
I see a lot of posts involving quitting the finder, and problems with keeping it quit, and I see posts about replacing Finder with Path Finder. I have one question: why?
I'm running Path Finder on a 500 MHz Pismo and a 350 MHz B&W, with Finder still running, and it's not hurting my performance. Why are so many people bent on doing away with the Finder in one way or another? Am I missing something?
Let's make a poll of it: how many of you kill or try to kill the finder, and how many use FNDRMACS or other tactics to replace the finder? What are your reasons? I did it for a while a year or two ago, and my reason was "because I can."
I'm running Path Finder on a 500 MHz Pismo and a 350 MHz B&W, with Finder still running, and it's not hurting my performance. Why are so many people bent on doing away with the Finder in one way or another? Am I missing something?
Let's make a poll of it: how many of you kill or try to kill the finder, and how many use FNDRMACS or other tactics to replace the finder? What are your reasons? I did it for a while a year or two ago, and my reason was "because I can."